81. This wanton preaching of pardons makes it hard even for learned men to defend the honor of the pope against calumny or, at least, against the shrewd questions of the laity.
82. They ask: “Why does not the pope empty purgatory on account of most holy charity and the great need of souls, the most righteous of causes, seeing that he redeems an infinite number of souls on account of sordid money, given for the erection of a basilica, which is a most trivial cause?”
83. “Why do requiems and anniversaries of the departed continue, and why does he not return the benefactions offered on their behalf or suffer them to be taken back, since it is now wrong to pray for the redeemed?”
84. “What is this piety of God and the pope in allowing the impious and hostile to secure, on payment of money, a pious soul, in friendship with God, while they do not redeem, of free charity, a soul that is, of itself, pious and beloved, on account of its need?”
85. “The penitential canons have long been repealed and are dead, in effect and by disuse. Why, then, are dispensations from them still conceded by indulgences, for payment, as if they were still in full force?”
86. “The pope’s riches, at this day, far exceed the wealth of the richest millionaires (cuius opes sunt opulentissimis Crassis crassiores). Cannot he, therefore, build one single basilica of St. Peter out of his own money rather than out of the money of the faithful poor?”
87. “Why does the pope remit or dispense to those who, through perfect contrition, have the right to plenary remission and dispensation?”
88. “What greater good would be gained by the Church if the pope were to do, a hundred times a day, what he does once a day, i.e., distribute these remissions and dispensations to any of the faithful?”
89. “If the pope, by means of his pardons, now seeks the salvation of souls rather than payment, why does he suspend letters and pardons formerly granted, since they are equally efficacious?”
90. To suppress these careful arguments of the laity merely by papal authority, instead of clearing them up by a reasoned reply, is to expose the Church and the pope to the ridicule of the enemy and to render Christians unhappy.
From: Documents of the Christian Church edited by Henry Bettenson; The World’s Classics series 495 (London: Oxford University Press, 1943), pp. 266-268.