In reality, Warfield and Hodge were emphasizing a position long honored by many Christians throughout the ages. The Bible gives no indication that copyists of Scripture were inspired – only the biblical authors were. As Augustine, Erasmus, Richard Baxter, the English apologist Whitaker, and the Roman Catholic critic Richard Simon pointed out, copies, in fact, do have errors. Then again, William Ames observed that God providentially protected the biblical writings as they passed through time such that no gross distortions ruined them. For many Protestants, versions were “authenticated” to the extent that they reflected “originals.” The autographs could be approached through the use of what we today would call textual criticism.
From: Biblical Authority: A Critique of the Rogers/McKim Proposal by John D. Woodbridge (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1982), p. 134.
John D. Woodbridge is Research Professor of Church History and the History of Christian Thought at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Deerfield, Illinois. He has been on the faculty there since 1970.